Back to search

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Data up to Jan 2025

Published2021
Citations41,779
References72

Total Citations Per Year

Abstract

References (72)

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

2009 • 78,446 citations

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

2009 • 53,927 citations

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.

2009 • 44,660 citations

The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration

2009 • 26,132 citations

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

2009 • 24,111 citations

The “Golden Age” of Probiotics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Observational Studies in Preterm Infants

2017 • 23,395 citations

PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

2018 • 22,437 citations

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

2015 • 20,884 citations

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

2009 • 20,118 citations

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

2008 • 18,785 citations

The Effect of Riding as an Alternative Treatment for Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2015 • 18,140 citations

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration

2009 • 15,310 citations

ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

2016 • 12,036 citations

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

2015 • 10,589 citations

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

2019 • 9,941 citations

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

2010 • 9,719 citations

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

2009 • 9,138 citations

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both

2017 • 6,713 citations

PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews

2021 • 5,676 citations

The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations

2015 • 5,606 citations

The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration

2009 • 5,583 citations

The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis

2019 • 4,116 citations

Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ

2012 • 2,473 citations

Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline

2020 • 2,222 citations

Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies

2018 • 2,151 citations

Reprint—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

2009 • 2,131 citations

Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data

2015 • 1,659 citations

ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed

2015 • 1,567 citations

PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews

2021 • 1,544 citations

Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement

2021 • 1,544 citations

Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis

2018 • 1,283 citations

Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines

2010 • 1,127 citations

The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews

2012 • 1,059 citations

Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews

2013 • 888 citations

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews

2007 • 853 citations

Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

2013 • 743 citations

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study

2016 • 626 citations

PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts

2013 • 603 citations

PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity

2012 • 572 citations

The Use of Think-aloud Methods in Qualitative Research An Introduction to Think-aloud Methods

2003 • 561 citations

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

2017 • 561 citations

The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence

2017 • 546 citations

Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches

2015 • 513 citations

Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network

2010 • 479 citations

PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews

2016 • 434 citations

Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis

2019 • 410 citations

COSMOS-E: Guidance on conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology

2019 • 354 citations

Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches

2015 • 351 citations

Machine learning for identifying Randomized Controlled Trials: An evaluation and practitioner's guide

2018 • 331 citations

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration

2008 • 313 citations

Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance

2019 • 305 citations

PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews

2021 • 253 citations

Establishing a new journal for systematic review products

2012 • 232 citations

Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review

2014 • 212 citations

Synthesising quantitative evidence in systematic reviews of complex health interventions

2019 • 199 citations

Ca-125: A Useful Marker to Distinguish Pulmonary Tuberculosis from Other Pulmonary Infections

2009 • 171 citations

A consensus-based transparency checklist

2019 • 149 citations

A randomised controlled trial of an Intervention to Improve Compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (IICARus)

2019 • 141 citations

Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines

2019 • 121 citations

Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist

2019 • 115 citations

Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research

2019 • 113 citations

Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial

2015 • 95 citations

Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions

2017 • 94 citations

Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (with examples from the <scp>MUDS</scp> study)

2017 • 84 citations

Impact of the mandatory implementation of reporting guidelines on reporting quality in a surgical journal: A before and after study

2016 • 82 citations

Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis

2017 • 55 citations

Meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO had a better completeness of reporting when they mention PRISMA

2019 • 54 citations

Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study

2019 • 52 citations

Graphics and statistics for cardiology: designing effective tables for presentation and publication

2017 • 42 citations

Evaluation of Reproducible Research Practices in Oncology Systematic Reviews With Meta-analyses Referenced by National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines

2019 • 31 citations

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

2020 • 26 citations

mcguinlu/PRISMA-Checklist: Initial release for manuscript submission

2020 • 8 citations

Cited By (0)

No citing papers found in database

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021) – BMJ | Metascience Observatory Explorer