Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (with examples from the <scp>MUDS</scp> study)
Data up to Jan 2025
Total Citations Per Year
Abstract
References (49)
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 • 78,446 citations
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
2015 • 10,589 citations
Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy
2008 • 2,344 citations
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
2013 • 986 citations
Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts
2007 • 921 citations
Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews
2013 • 888 citations
Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference?
1993 • 752 citations
The ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database — Update and Key Issues
2011 • 727 citations
Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study
1997 • 689 citations
Trial Publication after Registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
2009 • 385 citations
Outcome Reporting in Industry-Sponsored Trials of Gabapentin for Off-Label Use
2009 • 357 citations
Compliance with Results Reporting at ClinicalTrials.gov
2015 • 341 citations
Reporting Bias in Drug Trials Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: Review of Publication and Presentation
2008 • 323 citations
Compliance with mandatory reporting of clinical trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional study
2012 • 282 citations
Trial Reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov — The Final Rule
2016 • 278 citations
Timing and Completeness of Trial Results Posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and Published in Journals
2013 • 232 citations
Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review
2015 • 207 citations
Reporting of Adverse Events in Published and Unpublished Studies of Health Care Interventions: A Systematic Review
2016 • 202 citations
Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established
2017 • 199 citations
Restoring invisible and abandoned trials: a call for people to publish the findings
2013 • 178 citations
Bias Due to Changes in Specified Outcomes during the Systematic Review Process
2010 • 150 citations
Toward a New Era of Trust and Transparency in Clinical Trials
2016 • 127 citations
Multiple outcomes and analyses in clinical trials create challenges for interpretation and research synthesis
2017 • 117 citations
Multiple publication of reports of drug trials
1989 • 111 citations
Publication Bias in Antipsychotic Trials: An Analysis of Efficacy Comparing the Published Literature to the US Food and Drug Administration Database
2012 • 106 citations
Methods for obtaining unpublished data
2011 • 105 citations
Impact of document type on reporting quality of clinical drug trials: a comparison of registry reports, clinical study reports, and journal publications
2012 • 103 citations
Cherry-picking by trialists and meta-analysts can drive conclusions about intervention efficacy
2017 • 97 citations
Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses
2017 • 95 citations
Outcomes in Cochrane Systematic Reviews Addressing Four Common Eye Conditions: An Evaluation of Completeness and Comparability
2014 • 89 citations
Improving transparency and reproducibility through registration: The status of intervention trials published in clinical psychology journals.
2016 • 78 citations
Clinical study reports of randomised controlled trials: an exploratory review of previously confidential industry reports
2013 • 74 citations
Use of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Data Repository
2017 • 72 citations
Systematic reviewers commonly contact study authors but do so with limited rigor
2008 • 66 citations
Despite Law, Fewer Than One In Eight Completed Studies Of Drugs And Biologics Are Reported On Time On ClinicalTrials.gov
2011 • 61 citations
Data Sharing — Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze?
2016 • 53 citations
ClinicalTrials.gov and Drugs@FDA: A Comparison of Results Reporting for New Drug Approval Trials
2016 • 48 citations
A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results
2017 • 46 citations
How to access and process FDA drug approval packages for use in research
2013 • 41 citations
Dependability of results in conference abstracts of randomized controlled trials in ophthalmology and author financial conflicts of interest as a factor associated with full publication
2016 • 31 citations
Are manufacturers sharing data as promised?
2015 • 26 citations
Most systematic reviews of adverse effects did not include unpublished data
2016 • 25 citations
Integrating multiple data sources (MUDS) for meta-analysis to improve patient-centered outcomes research: a protocol for a systematic review
2015 • 19 citations
Focus on sharing individual patient data distracts from other ways of improving trial transparency
2017 • 19 citations
Can We Depend on Investigators to Identify and Register Randomized Controlled Trials?
2012 • 17 citations
Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews related to wound care: An investigation into prespecification
2017 • 17 citations
Who Has Used Internal Company Documents for Biomedical and Public Health Research and Where Did They Find Them?
2014 • 11 citations
The European Medicines Agency and Publication of Clinical Study Reports
2017 • 10 citations
Effect of a once-daily gastroretentive formulation of gabapentin on the Brief Pain Inventory Scale scores in patients with postherpetic neuralgia
2012 • 1 citations
Cited By (0)
No citing papers found in database