Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies
Data up to Jan 2025
Total Citations Per Year
Abstract
References (38)
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
2009 • 44,660 citations
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
2009 • 26,132 citations
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 • 20,118 citations
QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
2011 • 10,655 citations
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
2009 • 9,138 citations
Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews
2005 • 2,849 citations
The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed
2005 • 2,478 citations
Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests
1999 • 1,799 citations
STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration
2016 • 1,680 citations
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
2015 • 1,567 citations
Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review
2011 • 1,549 citations
A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations
2001 • 1,349 citations
Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research
2014 • 1,168 citations
Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines
2010 • 1,127 citations
Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?
2010 • 1,059 citations
STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
2015 • 684 citations
PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts
2013 • 603 citations
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
2023 • 483 citations
Delphi methodology in health research: how to do it?
2015 • 481 citations
Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy
1995 • 471 citations
Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study
2014 • 337 citations
Association of Study Quality with Completeness of Reporting: Have Completeness of Reporting and Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Major Radiology Journals Changed Since Publication of the PRISMA Statement?
2013 • 142 citations
Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review
2017 • 125 citations
Pitfalls of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Imaging Research
2015 • 88 citations
The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review
2011 • 65 citations
STARD for Abstracts: essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in journal or conference abstracts
2017 • 62 citations
Overinterpretation of Research Findings: Evidence of “Spin” in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
2017 • 62 citations
Performance of ultrasonography screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2020 • 61 citations
Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy in Imaging Journals: Analysis of Pooling Techniques and Their Effect on Summary Estimates of Diagnostic Accuracy
2016 • 54 citations
Uptake of newer methodological developments and the deployment of meta-analysis in diagnostic test research: a systematic review
2011 • 45 citations
Treatment of multiple test readers in diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews-meta-analyses of imaging studies
2017 • 41 citations
Systematic overview finds variation in approaches to investigating and reporting on sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies
2014 • 30 citations
Assessing variability in results in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies
2016 • 28 citations
Infrequent and incomplete registration of test accuracy studies: analysis of recent study reports
2014 • 27 citations
The Moses–Littenberg meta-analytical method generates systematic differences in test accuracy compared to hierarchical meta-analytical models
2016 • 20 citations
Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study
2014 • 18 citations
Reported estimates of diagnostic accuracy in ophthalmology conference abstracts were not associated with full-text publication
2016 • 17 citations
Statistical models for quantifying diagnostic accuracy with multiple lesions per patient
2008 • 15 citations
Cited By (0)
No citing papers found in database