The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar

The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration

2009 • 26,132 citations

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

2009 • 9,138 citations

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

2007 • 3,992 citations

Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions

1997 • 2,082 citations

AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

2009 • 1,634 citations

How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set

2014 • 1,272 citations

Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?

2010 • 1,059 citations

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews

2007 • 853 citations

Do Certain Countries Produce Only Positive Results? A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials

1998 • 678 citations

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study

2016 • 626 citations

A Brief History of Research Synthesis

2002 • 516 citations

How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care

2014 • 390 citations

The quality of evidence in Chinese meta-analyses needs to be improved

2016 • 167 citations

Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties

2014 • 149 citations

A Case Study of Discordant Overlapping Meta-Analyses: Vitamin D Supplements and Fracture

2014 • 56 citations

Epidemiology, Quality and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Traditional Chinese Medicine Interventions Published in Chinese Journals

2011 • 56 citations

Recent meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic: a systematic examination

2015 • 55 citations

The Geometric Increase in Meta-Analyses from China in the Genomic Era

2013 • 52 citations

Are randomized trials conducted in China or India biased? A comparative empirical analysis

2010 • 48 citations

Disorganized Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: Time to Systematize the Conduct and Publication of These Study Overviews?

2015 • 43 citations

How many Cochrane reviews are needed to cover existing evidence on the effects of health care interventions?

2003 • 37 citations

Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals

2014 • 29 citations

Epidemiology, Quality, and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Acupuncture Interventions Published in Chinese Journals

2012 • 24 citations

An assessment of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for non-communicable diseases (NCDs): more and higher quality research is required in less developed countries

2015 • 23 citations

Cochrane Collaboration and the evolution of evidence

2005 • 21 citations

Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews or meta‐analyses in nursing field in <scp>C</scp>hina

2013 • 19 citations

What is the future of biomedical research?

2015 • 17 citations

Cochrane Collaboration in China 1996–2013

2014 • 3 citations