Back to search

Is the Best Evidence Good Enough: Quality Assessment and Factor Analysis of Meta-Analyses on Depression

Data up to Jan 2025

Published2016
Citations16
References30

Total Citations Per Year

Abstract

References (30)

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

2009 • 78,446 citations

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

2009 • 53,927 citations

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.

2009 • 44,660 citations

The Effect of Riding as an Alternative Treatment for Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2015 • 18,140 citations

Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement

1999 • 4,736 citations

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

2007 • 3,992 citations

Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions

1997 • 2,082 citations

The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review

2015 • 1,659 citations

The global burden of disease, 1990–2020

1998 • 1,601 citations

Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials

1987 • 1,278 citations

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews

2007 • 853 citations

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

2017 • 561 citations

External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)

2007 • 539 citations

Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science

2008 • 490 citations

An international registry of systematic-review protocols

2010 • 439 citations

Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review

2006 • 439 citations

A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews.

1997 • 396 citations

Meta-analysis: Neither quick nor easy

2002 • 265 citations

Association of Study Quality with Completeness of Reporting: Have Completeness of Reporting and Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Major Radiology Journals Changed Since Publication of the PRISMA Statement?

2013 • 142 citations

Exploratory or analytic meta-analysis: Should we distinguish between them?

1995 • 93 citations

Quality of Conduct and Reporting of Meta-analyses of Surgical Interventions

2015 • 66 citations

Industry sponsorship bias in research findings: a network meta-analysis of LDL cholesterol reduction in randomised trials of statins

2014 • 59 citations

Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis

2008 • 57 citations

Is Quality and Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Published in High Impact Radiology Journals Associated with Citation Rates?

2015 • 49 citations

Reporting and methodological qualities of published surgical meta-analyses

2015 • 33 citations

Understanding and evaluating meta-analysis

2015 • 28 citations

Quality assessment of meta-analyses of RCTs of pharmacotherapy in major depressive disorder

2004 • 23 citations

Quality Assessment and Factor Analysis of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Endoscopic Ultrasound Diagnosis

2015 • 16 citations

A systematic review of the quality and impact of anxiety disorder meta-analyses

2009 • 12 citations

Deleted Work

1955 • 0 citations

Cited By (0)

No citing papers found in database

Is the Best Evidence Good Enough: Quality Assessment and Factor Analysis of Meta-Analyses… (2016) – PLoS ONE | Metascience Observatory Explorer