Back to search

A phase II randomised trial comparing the cisplatin–etoposide combination chemotherapy with or without carboplatin as second-line therapy for small-cell lung cancer

Data up to Jan 2025

Published2002
Citations19
References20

Total Citations Per Year

Abstract

References (20)

Topotecan Versus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Vincristine for the Treatment of Recurrent Small-Cell Lung Cancer

1999 • 909 citations

A Southwest Oncology Group study

1993 • 778 citations

Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin versus alternation of these two regimens in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group.

1992 • 532 citations

Statistical Tables for the Design of Clinical Trials.

1988 • 464 citations

Randomized comparison of etoposide-cisplatin vs. etoposide-carboplatin and irradiation in small-cell lung cancer

1994 • 260 citations

A systematic review of the role of etoposide and cisplatin in the chemotherapy of small cell lung cancer with methodology assessment and meta-analysis

2000 • 249 citations

Etoposide (VP-16) and cisplatin: an effective treatment for relapse in small-cell lung cancer.

1985 • 188 citations

On the Use of Pocock and Simon's Method for Balancing Treatment Numbers over Prognostic Factors in the Controlled Clinical Trial

1976 • 130 citations

Multiple-drug weekly chemotherapy versus standard combination regimen in small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized study conducted by the European Lung Cancer Working Party.

1993 • 80 citations

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine in etoposide- and cisplatin-resistant small cell lung cancer.

1987 • 79 citations

Second-line chemotherapy and its evaluation in small cell lung cancer

1999 • 69 citations

VP-16 alone and in combination with cisplatin in previously treated patients with small cell lung cancer

1984 • 68 citations

Phase II randomized trial comparing high-dose cisplatin with moderate-dose cisplatin and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. European Lung Cancer Working Party.

1994 • 51 citations

Phase III randomized trial comparing moderate-dose cisplatin to combined cisplatin and carboplatin in addition to mitomycin and ifosfamide in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer

2000 • 30 citations

Phase III randomized trial comparing cisplatin and carboplatin with or without ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. European Lung Cancer Working Party.

1998 • 30 citations

A comparison of methods of calculation for estimating carboplatin AUC with a retrospective pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

1999 • 28 citations

Comparison of etoposide and cisplatin with bis-chloro-ethylnitrosourea, thiotepa, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide for salvage treatment in small cell lung cancer. A Southwest Oncology Group Study

1990 • 25 citations

Evaluation of high-dose etoposide combined with cisplatin for treating relapsed small cell lung cancer

1990 • 20 citations

Superiority of high-dose platinum (cisplatin and carboplatin) compared to carboplatin alone in combination chemotherapy for small-cell lung carcinoma: A prospective randomised trial of 280 consecutive patients

2001 • 16 citations

[Comparison of 2 cisplatin and etoposide dosages in relapsing small cell lung cancer].

1992 • 2 citations

Cited By (0)

No citing papers found in database

A phase II randomised trial comparing the cisplatin–etoposide combination chemotherapy… (2002) – Annals of Oncology | Metascience Observatory Explorer