Back to search

Blinded by PRISMA: Are Systematic Reviewers Focusing on PRISMA and Ignoring Other Guidelines?

Data up to Jan 2025

Published2014
Citations87
References24

Total Citations Per Year

Abstract

References (24)

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

2009 • 78,446 citations

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

2009 • 53,927 citations

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.

2009 • 44,660 citations

The “Golden Age” of Probiotics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Observational Studies in Preterm Infants

2017 • 23,395 citations

Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>

2000 • 18,725 citations

The Effect of Riding as an Alternative Treatment for Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2015 • 18,140 citations

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

2010 • 12,621 citations

QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

2011 • 10,655 citations

Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

2007 • 6,405 citations

Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement

1999 • 4,736 citations

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

2007 • 3,992 citations

The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews

2003 • 3,559 citations

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

2010 • 1,654 citations

Bias and causal associations in observational research

2002 • 1,339 citations

Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

2008 • 1,051 citations

Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

2013 • 743 citations

Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology

2000 • 448 citations

SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 1: What is evidence-informed policymaking?

2009 • 368 citations

A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics

2012 • 97 citations

From QUOROM to PRISMA: A Survey of High-Impact Medical Journals' Instructions to Authors and a Review of Systematic Reviews in Anesthesia Literature

2011 • 91 citations

The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review

2011 • 65 citations

Moderate agreement between self-reported stroke and hospital-recorded stroke in two cohorts of Australian women: a validation study

2015 • 46 citations

The feasibility of determining the impact of primary health care research projects using the Payback Framework

2009 • 38 citations

Estimates of sensitivity and specificity can be biased when reporting the results of the second test in a screening trial conducted in series

2010 • 26 citations

Cited By (0)

No citing papers found in database

Blinded by PRISMA: Are Systematic Reviewers Focusing on PRISMA and Ignoring Other… (2014) – PLoS ONE | Metascience Observatory Explorer