CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance

A Comparison of Virtual and Conventional Colonoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal Polyps

1999 • 742 citations

Colorectal Neoplasia: Performance Characteristics of CT Colonography for Detection in 300 Patients

2001 • 503 citations

CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps.

1998 • 268 citations

Colorectal Neoplasms: Prospective Comparison of Thin-Section Low-Dose Multi–Detector Row CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy for Detection

2002 • 256 citations

Performance Parameters for Screening and Diagnostic Mammography: Specialist and General Radiologists

2002 • 248 citations

How experience and training influence mammography expertise

1999 • 198 citations

An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy)

1999 • 185 citations

Optimizing Colonic Distention for Multi–Detector Row CT Colonography: Effect of Hyoscine Butylbromide and Rectal Balloon Catheter

2003 • 162 citations

Comparison of Supine and Prone Scanning Separately and in Combination at CT Colonography

2003 • 160 citations

Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography

2002 • 151 citations

Standardized Abnormal Interpretation and Cancer Detection Ratios to Assess Reading Volume and Reader Performance in a Breast Screening Program

2000 • 128 citations

Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy)

2000 • 113 citations

CT Colonography: Multiobserver Diagnostic Performance

2002 • 75 citations

Effect of investigator experience in CT colonography

2002 • 53 citations

Use of Multidetector-row CT Colonography for Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients Referred via the Department of Health “2-Week-Wait” Initiative

2003 • 46 citations

Diagnostic performance of virtual colonoscopy

2002 • 43 citations

Just how valuable is double reporting in screening mammography?

1997 • 27 citations

Error Review: Can This Improve Reporting Performance?

2001 • 21 citations