Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in the Orthopaedic Literature

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

1997 • 47,526 citations

Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>

2000 • 18,725 citations

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

2007 • 3,992 citations

Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research

2000 • 1,803 citations

AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

2009 • 1,634 citations

Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry

2008 • 1,544 citations

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis

2008 • 1,137 citations

Meta‐Analysis Of Controlled Clinical Trials

2002 • 811 citations

External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)

2007 • 539 citations

Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery

2001 • 195 citations

Novel methods to deal with publication biases: secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publications

2009 • 173 citations

Evaluating Meta-analyses in the General Surgical Literature

2005 • 134 citations

Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts

2003 • 99 citations

Twenty Years of Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery: Has Quality Kept Up with Quantity?

2010 • 82 citations

Some limits to evidence-based medicine: a case study from elective orthopaedics

1999 • 80 citations

PRISMA Statement

2010 • 68 citations

Doubling the Impact

2004 • 63 citations

Journal Quality Metrics: Options to Consider Other Than Impact Factors

2011 • 60 citations

Expanding the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (Ex-GRADE) for Evidence-Based Clinical Recommendations: Validation Study

2012 • 55 citations

Methodology and Reporting Quality of Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis of Traditional Chinese Medicine

2007 • 48 citations

Systematic reviews involving complementary and alternative medicine interventions had higher quality of reporting than conventional medicine reviews

2005 • 41 citations

Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews

2012 • 35 citations

Meta-Analyses in Joint Arthroplasty: A Review of Quantity, Quality, and Impact

2011 • 28 citations

Evidence‐based medicine: how good is the evidence?

2001 • 21 citations

Evaluation of meta‐analyses in the otolaryngological literature

2008 • 16 citations