Back to search

Review of mixed treatment comparisons in published systematic reviews shows marked increase since 2009

Data up to Jan 2025

Published2014
Citations87
References19

Total Citations Per Year

Abstract

References (19)

The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration

2009 • 26,132 citations

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration

2009 • 15,310 citations

Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement

1999 • 4,736 citations

Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care

2010 • 2,620 citations

Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons

2004 • 1,970 citations

Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis

2010 • 1,891 citations

Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence

2005 • 1,457 citations

Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1

2011 • 939 citations

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews

2007 • 853 citations

Conducting Indirect-Treatment-Comparison and Network-Meta-Analysis Studies: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 2

2011 • 698 citations

Indirect comparisons of competing interventions

2005 • 674 citations

Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement

2000 • 420 citations

Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews

2009 • 379 citations

Addressing between‐study heterogeneity and inconsistency in mixed treatment comparisons: Application to stroke prevention treatments in individuals with non‐rheumatic atrial fibrillation

2009 • 221 citations

A Bayesian Method for Synthesizing Evidence: The Confidence Profile Method

1990 • 103 citations

Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials

2009 • 75 citations

Mixed treatment comparison of repeated measurements of a continuous endpoint: an example using topical treatments for primary open‐angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension

2011 • 45 citations

Network Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Multiple Sclerosis

2012 • 25 citations

BAYESIAN META-ANALYSIS ON MEDICAL DEVICES: APPLICATION TO IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATORS

2012 • 5 citations

Cited By (0)

No citing papers found in database

Review of mixed treatment comparisons in published systematic reviews shows marked… (2014) – Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | Metascience Observatory Explorer