Back to search

Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?

Data up to Jan 2025

Published2009
Citations63
References36

Total Citations Per Year

Abstract

References (36)

Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults

2014 • 11,438 citations

The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.

1979 • 7,706 citations

Publication bias in clinical research

1991 • 3,034 citations

Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context

2000 • 2,282 citations

Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context.

2002 • 1,441 citations

The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence

1990 • 1,335 citations

meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies

1998 • 1,311 citations

Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences

2000 • 1,110 citations

Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again

1982 • 1,069 citations

Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results

1992 • 838 citations

Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects

1997 • 831 citations

Association of Funding and Conclusions in Randomized Drug Trials

2003 • 732 citations

Do Certain Countries Produce Only Positive Results? A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials

1998 • 678 citations

Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors

2005 • 605 citations

Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct

1990 • 542 citations

Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials.

2004 • 535 citations

Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions

2007 • 534 citations

Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review

2006 • 439 citations

Source of funding and outcome of clinical trials

1986 • 410 citations

Publication Bias: The Problem That Won't Go Away

1993 • 395 citations

Peer review in health sciences

2002 • 344 citations

How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data.

1997 • 310 citations

Peer Review in Health Sciences

1999 • 267 citations

Time to publication for results of clinical trials

2007 • 226 citations

Commercially Funded and United States-Based Research Is More Likely to Be Published; Good-Quality Studies with Negative Outcomes Are Not

2007 • 165 citations

The association between funding by commercial interests and study outcome in randomized controlled drug trials

2001 • 159 citations

Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias

2005 • 151 citations

Misleading meta-analysis

1995 • 144 citations

Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process?

1994 • 134 citations

Association Between Funding Source and Study Outcome in Orthopaedic Research

2003 • 117 citations

Positive‐outcome Bias: Comparison of Emergency Medicine and General Medicine Literatures

1994 • 42 citations

Delay and failure to publish dental research

2005 • 30 citations

The criteria used by editors of scientific dental journals in the assessment of manuscripts submitted for publication.

1999 • 30 citations

Impact Factor A Review with Specific Relevance to Orthodontic Journals

2001 • 29 citations

A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process.

2000 • 27 citations

Advanced orthodontic education: evolution of assessment criteria and methods to meet future challenges.

2005 • 14 citations

Cited By (0)

No citing papers found in database

Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published? (2009) – American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | Metascience Observatory Explorer