Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?
Data up to Jan 2025
Total Citations Per Year
Abstract
References (36)
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults
2014 • 11,438 citations
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
1979 • 7,706 citations
Publication bias in clinical research
1991 • 3,034 citations
Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context
2000 • 2,282 citations
Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context.
2002 • 1,441 citations
The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence
1990 • 1,335 citations
meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies
1998 • 1,311 citations
Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences
2000 • 1,110 citations
Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again
1982 • 1,069 citations
Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results
1992 • 838 citations
Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects
1997 • 831 citations
Association of Funding and Conclusions in Randomized Drug Trials
2003 • 732 citations
Do Certain Countries Produce Only Positive Results? A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials
1998 • 678 citations
Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors
2005 • 605 citations
Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct
1990 • 542 citations
Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials.
2004 • 535 citations
Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions
2007 • 534 citations
Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review
2006 • 439 citations
Source of funding and outcome of clinical trials
1986 • 410 citations
Publication Bias: The Problem That Won't Go Away
1993 • 395 citations
Peer review in health sciences
2002 • 344 citations
How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data.
1997 • 310 citations
Peer Review in Health Sciences
1999 • 267 citations
Time to publication for results of clinical trials
2007 • 226 citations
Commercially Funded and United States-Based Research Is More Likely to Be Published; Good-Quality Studies with Negative Outcomes Are Not
2007 • 165 citations
The association between funding by commercial interests and study outcome in randomized controlled drug trials
2001 • 159 citations
Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias
2005 • 151 citations
Misleading meta-analysis
1995 • 144 citations
Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process?
1994 • 134 citations
Association Between Funding Source and Study Outcome in Orthopaedic Research
2003 • 117 citations
Positive‐outcome Bias: Comparison of Emergency Medicine and General Medicine Literatures
1994 • 42 citations
Delay and failure to publish dental research
2005 • 30 citations
The criteria used by editors of scientific dental journals in the assessment of manuscripts submitted for publication.
1999 • 30 citations
Impact Factor A Review with Specific Relevance to Orthodontic Journals
2001 • 29 citations
A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process.
2000 • 27 citations
Advanced orthodontic education: evolution of assessment criteria and methods to meet future challenges.
2005 • 14 citations
Cited By (0)
No citing papers found in database