Influence of trial registration on reporting quality of randomized trials: Study from highest ranked journals

A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure

1979 • 20,726 citations

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

2008 • 18,785 citations

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials

1995 • 5,696 citations

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials

2001 • 5,358 citations

The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration

2001 • 3,719 citations

What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?

2008 • 2,889 citations

The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials

2001 • 2,522 citations

Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials

2000 • 1,140 citations

Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials

2001 • 1,012 citations

Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review

2006 • 813 citations

Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials

2009 • 705 citations

Some Thoughts on Clinical Trials, Especially Problems of Multiplicity

1977 • 470 citations

Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials

2001 • 318 citations

Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

2004 • 295 citations

Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles

2002 • 286 citations

The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement

2005 • 218 citations

Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement

2006 • 210 citations

Clinical trial registration: transparency is the watchword

2006 • 164 citations

The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist

2002 • 163 citations

Assessing the potential for bias in meta-analysis due to selective reporting of subgroup analyses within studies

2000 • 117 citations

Applying the CONSORT and STROBE Statements to Evaluate the Reporting Quality of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration Studies

2008 • 75 citations

An analysis of general medical and specialist journals that endorse CONSORT found that reporting was not enforced consistently

2005 • 73 citations

Chinese authors do need CONSORT: Reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals

2008 • 68 citations

Quality of reporting Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)

2008 • 64 citations

Quality of Reports on Randomized Controlled Trials Conducted in Japan: Evaluation of Adherence to the CONSORT Statement

2009 • 56 citations

Analysis of the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in Acute and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, and Myelodysplastic Syndromes as Governed by the CONSORT Statement

2009 • 43 citations

Citation indexes do not reflect methodological quality in lung cancer randomised trials

2003 • 39 citations

Validity of the Impact Factor of Journals as a Measure of Randomized Controlled Trial Quality

2006 • 36 citations

Compliance with the CONSORT checklist in obstetric anaesthesia randomised controlled trials

2004 • 33 citations