Back to search

Comparison of two random-effects methods of meta-analysis.

Data up to Jan 2025

Published2002
Citations120
References40

Total Citations Per Year

Abstract

References (40)

Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings

2015 • 5,446 citations

Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research

1976 • 4,467 citations

Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis.

1998 • 2,584 citations

Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings.

1991 • 2,415 citations

PERSONALITY MEASURES AS PREDICTORS OF JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYTIC REVIEW

1991 • 1,506 citations

Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance.

1993 • 1,049 citations

Combining results of independent studies.

1978 • 891 citations

Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization.

1977 • 754 citations

Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects Meta‐Analysis Models: Implications for Cumulative Research Knowledge

2000 • 720 citations

METAANALYSES OF VALIDITY STUDIES PUBLISHED BETWEEN 1964 AND 1982 AND THE INVESTIGATION OF STUDY CHARACTERISTICS

1984 • 576 citations

Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility intervals in meta-analysis.

1990 • 561 citations

Averaging correlation coefficients: Should Fisher's z transformation be used?

1987 • 365 citations

A comparison of fixed-effects and mixed (random-effects) models for meta-analysis tests of moderator variable effects.

1998 • 344 citations

Combining Information: Statistical Issues and Opportunities for Research

1993 • 287 citations

A multivariate mixed linear model for meta-analysis.

1996 • 212 citations

INTERRATER CORRELATIONS DO NOT ESTIMATE THE RELIABILITY OF JOB PERFORMANCE RATINGS

2000 • 192 citations

Validity of Customer Service Measures in Personnel Selection: A Review of Criterion and Construct Evidence

1998 • 191 citations

USING RANDOM RATHER THAN FIXED EFFECTS MODELS IN META‐ANALYSIS: IMPLICATIONS FOR SITUATIONAL SPECIFICITY AND VALIDITY GENERALIZATION

1996 • 160 citations

On seeking moderator variables in the meta-analysis of correlational data: A Monte Carlo investigation of statistical power and resistance to Type I error.

1986 • 155 citations

Development and test of a new model for validity generalization.

1980 • 118 citations

RELIABILITY IS NOT VALIDITY AND VALIDITY IS NOT RELIABILITY

2000 • 116 citations

Predicting Aircraft Pilot- Training Success: A Meta-Analysis of Published Research

1994 • 100 citations

Meta-analysis for integrating study outcomes: A Monte Carlo study of its susceptibility to Type I and Type II errors.

1987 • 99 citations

A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE VALIDITY OF METHODS FOR RATING TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE IN PERSONNEL SELECTION

1988 • 94 citations

Psychological Measures As Predictors of Pilot Performance: A Meta-Analysis

1996 • 92 citations

Validity generalization in the context of situational models.

1992 • 91 citations

Validity generalization and situational specificity: A second look at the 75% rule and Fisher's z transformation.

1988 • 76 citations

A note on validity generalization procedures.

1986 • 74 citations

Two new procedures for studying validity generalization.

1983 • 67 citations

An unbiased correction for sampling error in validity generalization studies.

1989 • 54 citations

Validity generalization and situational moderation in the life insurance industry.

1981 • 47 citations

The power of the Schmidt and Hunter Additive Model of Validity Generalization.

1987 • 39 citations

Multiplicative validity generalization model: Accuracy of estimates as a function of sample size and mean, variance, and shape of distribution of true validities.

1982 • 35 citations

Validity generalization: Some critical remarks on the Schmidt‐Hunter procedure*

1984 • 25 citations

Meta-analysis and moderator variables: A cautionary note on transportability.

1989 • 25 citations

A likelihood-based model for validity generalization.

1990 • 20 citations

Validity generalization and hypothetical reliability distributions: A test of the Schmidt-Hunter procedure.

1988 • 18 citations

What is the interpretation of the validity generalization estimate S² = S² ^ S²?

1988 • 10 citations

A likelihood-based model for validity generalization.

1990 • 9 citations

What is the interpretation of the validity generalization estimate S²p=S²r-S²e?

1988 • 8 citations

Cited By (0)

No citing papers found in database

Comparison of two random-effects methods of meta-analysis. (2002) – Journal of Applied Psychology | Metascience Observatory Explorer